If there is a holy
grail of weight loss, it would be a program that allows someone to shed
fat rapidly while hanging on to or even augmenting muscle. Ideally, it
would also be easy.
A new study describes a
workout and diet regimen that accomplishes two of those goals
remarkably well. But it may not be so easy.
For most of us, losing
weight and keeping it off is difficult. If you consume fewer calories
than your body requires for daily operations, it turns to internal
sources of fuel. Those sources consist of body fat and lean tissue,
meaning muscle. When someone on a diet drops a pound of body mass (a
measure that does not include water), much of that pound consists of
fat. But about a third or more can be made up of muscle.
The problem with
losing muscle is that, unlike fat tissue, muscle burns calories. Having
less muscle means a lower resting metabolic rate, so you burn fewer
calories throughout the day. Losing muscle may also discourage physical
activity, which is important for maintaining weight loss.
So researchers have
long been looking for weight loss programs that produce hefty amounts of
fat loss but diminish any decline in muscle.
For scientists at
McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, that goal seemed to demand a
high dose of protein and also plenty of exercise.
As the scientists
knew, amino acids in protein help muscle tissue to maintain itself and
to grow. Many past studies have suggested that low-calorie but
high-protein diets can result in less muscle loss than the same number
of calories but less protein.
However, the best dosage of protein in these circumstances has remained unclear, as has the role, if any, for exercise.
So for the new study, which was published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
the McMaster researchers rounded up 40 overweight young men who were
willing to commit to an intensive weight-loss program and divided them
in half.
All of the young men
began a diet in which their daily calories were cut by about 40 percent
(compared to what they needed to maintain weight). But for half of them,
this consisted of about 15 percent protein, 35 percent fat and 50
percent carbohydrates.
The other 20
volunteers began a diet that mimicked that of the first group, except
that theirs swapped the protein and fat ratios, so that 35 percent of
their calories came from protein and 15 percent from fat. Over all,
their protein intake was about three times the recommended dietary
allowance for most people.
The researchers
handled that switch by changing the make-up of a supplied drink. In the
low-protein group, the beverage contained high-fat milk and no added
protein. For the others, it consisted of low-fat milk and a large dollop
of whey protein.
All of the men also
began a grueling workout routine. Six days a week they reported to the
exercise lab and completed a strenuous full-body weight training
circuit, high-intensity intervals, or a series of explosive jumps and
other exercises known as plyometric training.
The diet and exercise
routine continued for four weeks, by the end of which time, “those guys
were done,” said Stuart Phillips, who holds a research chair in skeletal
muscle health at McMaster University and oversaw the study. “All they
could talk about was food.”
The routine had
succeeded in incinerating pounds from all of the participants. The men
in both groups weighed about 11 or 12 pounds less, on average.
But it was the
composition of that weight loss that differed. Unlike most people on
low-calorie diets, the men on the high-protein regimen had actually
gained muscle during the month, as much as three pounds of it. So in
these men, almost all of the 11 or 12 pounds they had lost over all had
been fat.
These results strongly
suggest that extra protein is advisable during weight loss, Dr.
Phillips said, to avoid stripping yourself of muscle.
But exercise is also
key, Dr. Phillips continued, particularly weight training, since it is
known to build muscle. Even the men on the lower-protein diet lost
little muscle mass, he pointed out, which was unexpected and almost
certainly due, he and his colleagues concluded, to exercise.
Of course, by the end
of the month, none of the men wished to continue. This type of extreme
calorie cutting combined with intense exercise “is not a sustainable
program in the long term,” Dr. Phillips said. “It’s more a kind of boot
camp,” he said, manageable in the short term by people who are very
committed and generally very healthy.
He and his colleagues
plan to conduct follow-up experiments to find a more realistic and
sustainable program. They plan, too, to study female volunteers and play
around with the diets’ composition, to establish definitively that it
is extra protein and not reduced fat that promotes muscle gains.
In the meantime, for
those hoping to become thin but not puny, various apps allow you to
determine the percentage of your diet that is composed of protein. If it
is below 10 or 15 percent, you might want to shift calories from fat to
protein. Renew your gym membership, too.
I guess any long-term diet will fail since the success of the outcome depends on people - and most get easily bored with repetitive acts. Take the case of the 3 Day Military diet which made me lose around 6 pounds, I think what made it work for me is the very short duration of the diet which I can cycle. This means I can stay on the diet for 3 days, take a rest on the following 4 days and then begin another round of dieting for 3 days, if there is still a need. Such flexibility is a great come-on for most people who get easily tired of long drawn out diets. For info on the military diet, here's where to go http://3daysmilitarydiet.com/results-reviews/military-diet-success.html
ReplyDelete